📚 Part of: Ancient Indian History & Colonial Administration Mcqs

Which of the following is correct about subsidiary alliance

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: D) Only (A) & (B).

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, IAS Prelims, Indian History Exams, State PSC Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a policy of the British East India Company to bring Indian princely states under British control. Under this policy, the states agreed to have a British Resident and maintain a British-controlled army. This allowed the British to exert influence and control over the states without formally annexing them.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing the Subsidiary Alliance with the Doctrine of Lapse.
  • Believing that all princely states were annexed directly by the British.
  • Overlooking the role of the British Resident in the governance of the princely states.
Explanation:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a significant policy implemented by the British East India Company in the late 18th and early 19th centuries to extend its control over Indian princely states. This policy was a strategic move to consolidate British power in India without the need for direct annexation, which would have been politically and militarily challenging.

Under the Subsidiary Alliance, the princely states agreed to maintain a British-controlled army within their territories. The British would provide military assistance to the state in exchange for a fixed annual payment. This arrangement ensured that the state could not afford to maintain its own army, thus making it dependent on the British for its defense. Additionally, the states were required to allow a British Resident to reside in their courts, who would act as an advisor and mediator in state affairs. In case of any disagreement, the king was bound to follow the Resident's advice, effectively giving the British the final say in governance.

The Subsidiary Alliance was a clever strategy that allowed the British to exert control over the princely states without formally annexing them. This policy was applied to several important states, including Hyderabad, Jodhpur, Gwalior, and Jaipur. These states were brought under British influence, but they retained their nominal sovereignty, which made the policy more palatable to the rulers and the local population.

It is important to note that the Subsidiary Alliance was distinct from other policies such as the Doctrine of Lapse, which dealt with the succession of rulers in princely states. The Subsidiary Alliance was primarily about military control and the presence of a British Resident, rather than direct annexation or succession issues.

In summary, the Subsidiary Alliance was a key policy that enabled the British to extend their influence over Indian princely states, ensuring their control without the need for direct annexation. This policy was a significant factor in the expansion of British power in India and played a crucial role in the eventual consolidation of British rule over the subcontinent.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is partially correct. Hyderabad, Jodhpur, Gwalior, and Jaipur were indeed brought under British control through the Subsidiary Alliance, but they were not annexed. The Subsidiary Alliance allowed the British to exert control over these states without formally annexing them. The misconception here is that annexation and control through the Subsidiary Alliance are the same, which they are not.
  • Option B: This option is correct. Under the Subsidiary Alliance, the king of the princely state was required to abide by the decisions of the British Resident in case of any disagreement. This ensured that the British had the final say in the governance of the state, effectively making the king a puppet ruler.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect. The right to adopt a child to succeed the throne is not related to the Subsidiary Alliance. This option likely confuses the Subsidiary Alliance with other policies such as the Doctrine of Lapse, which dealt with the succession of rulers in princely states. The Subsidiary Alliance was primarily about military control and the presence of a British Resident.
  • Option D: This option is correct. It correctly identifies that only options (A) and (B) are accurate statements about the Subsidiary Alliance. Option (A) correctly identifies the states that were brought under British control through the Subsidiary Alliance, and option (B) correctly states the role of the British Resident in resolving disputes.

Mnemonic: SAB: Subsidiary Alliance Brings control

⬅️ Back to Ancient Indian History & Colonial Administration Mcqs – Practice all questions