Explanations:The question revolves around the historical context of Andhra Pradesh, specifically focusing on the historical figure Bhismak and his capital. Bhismak was a ruler in ancient Andhra Pradesh, and his capital was indeed Kudina. This is a well-documented fact in the historical records of the region.
However, the second statement about Bhismak's son's name being Sisu pal is not accurate. Historical records do not support this claim. It is important to distinguish between the factual information about Bhismak's capital and the incorrect information about his son's name.
Understanding the historical context of Andhra Pradesh is crucial for students preparing for competitive examinations such as the UPSC, SSC, and State PSC. These examinations often include questions that test the candidate's knowledge of regional history, including the capitals of historical rulers and significant events.
When studying historical figures and their capitals, it is essential to rely on verified historical sources and to be cautious of misinformation. The capital of Bhismak being Kudina is a well-established fact, and this information is widely accepted in historical studies. On the other hand, the name of Bhismak's son is not as well-documented, and the claim that his son's name was Sisu pal is not supported by historical evidence.
Therefore, the correct answer is that only the first statement is correct, as it accurately reflects the historical capital of Bhismak. The second statement about his son's name being Sisu pal is incorrect and should be disregarded.