Explanation: In the traditional Indian administrative system, revenue officers played a crucial role in the collection and management of taxes. The roles of Khut and Muqaddam were specifically designed to handle revenue-related tasks, making them key figures in the local governance structure.
**Khut:**
Khut was a revenue officer who was directly responsible for collecting taxes from the peasants and maintaining the revenue records. This role was essential for ensuring that the revenue collected was accurately recorded and reported to higher authorities. Khut was often a local person who had a good understanding of the community and could effectively manage the revenue collection process.
**Muqaddam:**
Muqaddam was another revenue officer who assisted the Khut in the collection of revenue. The Muqaddam was responsible for helping to maintain the revenue records and ensuring that the collection process was smooth and efficient. The Muqaddam often acted as a liaison between the Khut and the peasants, helping to resolve any issues that might arise during the revenue collection process.
**Chaudhari:**
Chaudhari, on the other hand, was a higher-ranking official in the administrative hierarchy. While the Chaudhari might have had some oversight over the revenue collection process, their role was not solely focused on revenue. The Chaudhari had broader responsibilities that included maintaining law and order, resolving disputes, and overseeing various administrative tasks in the region. Therefore, the Chaudhari cannot be classified as a revenue officer in the same sense as Khut and Muqaddam.
In summary, the correct answer is (D) Only (A) & (B), as Khut and Muqaddam were specifically revenue officers, while Chaudhari had a broader administrative role that included but was not limited to revenue collection. Understanding the specific roles and responsibilities of these officials is crucial for comprehending the traditional Indian administrative system and its mechanisms for revenue collection and governance.