Explanation: To understand the context of the statements provided, it is essential to delve into the historical and contemporary aspects of West Bengal and Bangladesh.
The English East India Company (EEIC) was a British company that played a significant role in the colonization of India. In 1765, the EEIC gained control over the administration of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa through the Treaty of Allahabad. This treaty marked the beginning of the EEIC's absolute rule over Bengal, which lasted until the Indian Rebellion of 1857. The EEIC's rule was characterized by exploitation and mismanagement, leading to economic decline and famines in the region. The company's primary objective was to extract resources and wealth from Bengal to benefit the British economy, not to improve the welfare of the local population.
The second statement, "The English East India Company became the absolute rulers of Bengal in 1765," is historically accurate. The EEIC's control over Bengal was solidified through the Treaty of Allahabad, which granted them the right to collect revenue from the region. This marked the beginning of direct British rule in India, which would eventually lead to the establishment of the British Raj.
The third statement, "The government in Bangladesh is struggling to meet the needs of millions of refugees that have fled there," refers to a contemporary issue. Bangladesh has been facing a significant refugee crisis due to the influx of Rohingya refugees from Myanmar. The Rohingya are a Muslim minority group who have faced persecution and violence in Myanmar, leading to their mass exodus to Bangladesh. The Bangladeshi government has been struggling to provide adequate shelter, food, and healthcare to the large number of refugees, which has put a strain on the country's resources and infrastructure.
In conclusion, the correct answer is (D) Only 2, 3. The EEIC did become the absolute rulers of Bengal in 1765, and the current government in Bangladesh is indeed struggling with the needs of millions of refugees. The first statement is incorrect as the EEIC's rule was marked by exploitation rather than wise use of resources for the benefit of Bengal.