📚 Part of: Agricultural Geography And Indian History Mcqs

Who was the first Indian native ruler to accept the system of Subsidiary Alliance?

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: B) Nizam of Hyderabad.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, IAS Prelims, Indian History Exams, State PSC Exams

Difficulty: Easy

Concept notes:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a system introduced by the British East India Company to bring Indian rulers under British control. Under this system, Indian rulers were required to maintain a British military force within their territories and pay for it. The first Indian ruler to accept this alliance was the Nizam of Hyderabad in 1798.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing the Nizam of Hyderabad with other Indian rulers who also entered into the Subsidiary Alliance.
  • Believing that the Subsidiary Alliance was a voluntary agreement rather than a means of British control.
  • Not understanding the chronological order of Indian rulers who accepted the Subsidiary Alliance.
Explanation:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a significant policy introduced by the British East India Company in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. This system was designed to bring Indian rulers under British control by requiring them to maintain a British military force within their territories and pay for it. The British would then use this force to protect the ruler from external threats, but in reality, it was a means to exert control over the ruler's internal and external policies.

The first Indian ruler to accept the Subsidiary Alliance was the Nizam of Hyderabad, who entered into this agreement in 1798. The Nizam, Asaf Jah II, was the ruler of the princely state of Hyderabad, which was one of the largest and most powerful states in India at the time. The alliance was a strategic move by the British to gain a foothold in the Deccan region and to counter the growing influence of the Marathas and other regional powers.

The Subsidiary Alliance was a clever tactic by the British to extend their control over Indian territories without directly annexing them. By maintaining a British military force within the territories of the Indian rulers, the British could ensure that these rulers would not act against British interests. This system was followed by other Indian rulers, including the Scindia of Gwalior in 1803, the Gaikwad of Baroda in 1803, and many others.

It is important to note that the Subsidiary Alliance was not a voluntary agreement but rather a means of British control. The Indian rulers who accepted the alliance were often coerced into doing so, either through military pressure or the threat of annexation. The alliance marked the beginning of a series of agreements that would significantly alter the political landscape of India and pave the way for the eventual annexation of many Indian states by the British.

In summary, the Nizam of Hyderabad was the first Indian ruler to accept the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798, marking a significant step in the British strategy to control Indian territories. This alliance was a precursor to the British annexation of many Indian states and played a crucial role in the consolidation of British power in India.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: Scindia of Gwalior was not the first to accept the Subsidiary Alliance. He entered into the alliance in 1803, after the Nizam of Hyderabad. This misconception might arise from the prominence of Scindia in Indian history and the belief that he was an early adopter of British alliances.
  • Option B: The Nizam of Hyderabad was indeed the first Indian ruler to accept the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798. This alliance was a strategic move by the British to gain control over Indian territories and resources. The Nizam's acceptance marked the beginning of a series of alliances that would significantly alter the political landscape of India.
  • Option C: Dalip Singh of Punjab was not involved in the Subsidiary Alliance. He was the last Maharaja of the Sikh Empire and was deposed by the British in 1849. This option might be chosen due to confusion with other significant events in Punjab's history involving British control.
  • Option D: Gaikwad of Baroda entered into the Subsidiary Alliance in 1803, which was after the Nizam of Hyderabad. This misconception might arise from the prominence of the Gaikwad in the history of Baroda and the belief that he was an early adopter of British alliances.

Mnemonic: Nizam's Nod: Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to nod to the Subsidiary Alliance.

⬅️ Back to Agricultural Geography And Indian History Mcqs – Practice all questions