Explanations:Timur, also known as Tamerlane, was a powerful conqueror who led a series of military campaigns across Central Asia, the Middle East, and parts of India. His invasion of India in 1398 was one of the most significant events in the history of the Delhi Sultanate. Timur's invasion was marked by his brutal tactics and the destruction he wrought upon the city of Delhi and its surrounding areas.
After his successful campaign, Timur did not remain in India. Instead, he appointed local rulers to maintain control over the region. One of these appointments was Khizr Khan, who was given the governorship of Multan. Multan was a strategically important city located in the Punjab region, and Timur's decision to appoint Khizr Khan as its governor was a calculated move to ensure that the area remained under his influence even after his departure.
Khizr Khan was a trusted commander and had proven his loyalty and military prowess during Timur's campaigns. By appointing him to such an important position, Timur was able to secure a loyal ally in the region, which would help to maintain stability and order in the aftermath of his invasion. This appointment was a key part of Timur's broader strategy to consolidate his power and influence in the region.
It is important to note that the historical context of Timur's invasion and his subsequent appointments is crucial for understanding the political landscape of the Delhi Sultanate during this period. The Delhi Sultanate was a complex and dynamic political entity, and the actions of foreign invaders like Timur had a significant impact on its internal dynamics and power structures.
While Bahul Lodi was a later ruler of the Lodi dynasty, which came to power after Timur's invasion, he was not appointed by Timur. The Lodi dynasty was established in the early 15th century, long after Timur's departure from India. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is that Timur appointed Khizr Khan before leaving Delhi.