Explanations:The Indian independence movement was characterized by a diverse array of leaders with varying ideologies and approaches to achieving self-rule. Among these leaders, the moderate faction was particularly significant. Moderate leaders were those who believed in working within the existing legal framework and advocated for gradual change through constitutional means. They were generally more conservative and preferred to avoid direct confrontation with the British authorities.
Leaders such as Srinivasa Sastri, Sivasamy, and Natesan were prominent figures in the moderate faction. Srinivasa Sastri was a key figure in the Indian National Congress and played a significant role in promoting Hindu-Muslim unity. Sivasamy was also involved in the Indian National Congress and was known for his advocacy of constitutional methods to achieve self-rule. Natesan, another moderate leader, contributed to the Indian National Congress and was a proponent of gradual change and constitutional means.
In contrast, Subramanianar was not a moderate leader. He was a revolutionary and a poet who advocated for more radical and aggressive methods to achieve independence. Subramanianar is known for his Tamil poetry and his revolutionary ideas, which set him apart from the moderate leaders. His approach was more confrontational and aimed at immediate and direct action, which is in stark contrast to the moderate leaders who preferred a more measured and constitutional approach.
Understanding the distinction between moderate and radical leaders is crucial in the context of the Indian independence movement. The moderate leaders were instrumental in laying the groundwork for constitutional reforms and in building a broad-based movement for self-rule. Their approach was characterized by patience, negotiation, and a willingness to work within the existing legal framework. On the other hand, leaders like Subramanianar represented a more radical and revolutionary approach, which was focused on direct action and immediate change.
Therefore, the correct answer is Subramanianar, as he is not a moderate leader from Madras. This question tests the ability to distinguish between different ideological factions within the Indian independence movement and to identify the specific contributions and affiliations of leaders from Madras.