📚 Part of: Indian History And Environmental Awareness Mcqs

Which invader took away Shah Jahan's famous peacock throne during the sack of Delhi?

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: B) Nadir Shah.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, State PSC Exams, History Olympiads, Indian History Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

Nadir Shah, the ruler of Persia, invaded Delhi in 1739 and looted the city, taking away many valuable treasures, including the famous Peacock Throne of the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan. This event marked a significant blow to the Mughal Empire's prestige and power.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing Nadir Shah with Ahmad Shah Abdali, who also invaded Delhi but at a different time and did not take the Peacock Throne.
  • Misidentifying ShivaJi or Sambhaji, who were Maratha rulers and not invaders of Delhi.
Explanation:

The Peacock Throne, also known as Takht-e Tavous, was a symbol of the Mughal Empire's wealth and power. It was commissioned by Emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century and was one of the most valuable and ornate thrones in the world. The throne was adorned with precious stones, including the famous Koh-i-Noor diamond.

In 1739, Nadir Shah, the ruler of Persia, invaded Delhi. This invasion was part of his larger campaign to expand his empire and secure control over the region. Nadir Shah's forces defeated the Mughal army, and he entered Delhi, where he looted the city extensively. Among the many treasures he took was the Peacock Throne, which he transported back to Persia.

The invasion by Nadir Shah was a significant event in Indian history, marking a decline in the power and prestige of the Mughal Empire. It also highlighted the vulnerability of the Mughal capital, Delhi, to external invasions. The loss of the Peacock Throne was a symbolic blow to the Mughal rulers, representing the decline of their once-mighty empire.

It is important to distinguish Nadir Shah's invasion from other invasions of Delhi, such as those by Ahmad Shah Abdali, who invaded Delhi in 1757 and 1760. While Abdali's invasions were also significant, they did not involve the taking of the Peacock Throne. The confusion might arise because both Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali were invaders of Delhi, but the specific events and loot differ.

Understanding the historical context of Nadir Shah's invasion and the significance of the Peacock Throne helps in comprehending the broader narrative of the decline of the Mughal Empire and the impact of external invasions on Indian history. This event is often discussed in the context of the weakening of the Mughal state and the rise of regional powers like the Marathas, who were contemporaries of Nadir Shah but not directly involved in the looting of the Peacock Throne.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: Incorrect. Ahmad Shah Abdali invaded Delhi in 1757 and 1760, but he did not take the Peacock Throne. The confusion might arise because both were invaders of Delhi, but the timing and specific loot differ.
  • Option B: Correct. Nadir Shah, the ruler of Persia, invaded Delhi in 1739 and looted the city, taking away the Peacock Throne. This event is well-documented in historical records and is a significant event in Mughal history.
  • Option C: Incorrect. ShivaJi was a Maratha ruler and a prominent figure in the resistance against Mughal rule, but he was not an invader of Delhi and did not take the Peacock Throne. The confusion might arise from the prominence of Maratha rulers in Indian history.
  • Option D: Incorrect. Sambhaji was the son of ShivaJi and continued the Maratha struggle against the Mughals, but he was not an invader of Delhi and did not take the Peacock Throne. The confusion might arise from the historical context of Maratha resistance.

Mnemonic: Nadir Shah, N for "Nabob" (a term for a powerful ruler), who nabbed the throne.

⬅️ Back to Indian History And Environmental Awareness Mcqs – Practice all questions