📚 Part of: Jammu And Kashmir Mcqs: Agriculture, Constitution, Culture, Geography

Which article was abolished in jammu and kashmir

Category: Jammu And Kashmir Gk

Correct Answer: C) Article 370.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, State PSC Exams, Law Entrance Exams, History Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution granted special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It allowed the state to have its own constitution and certain laws that were not applicable to other states in India. This article was abrogated on August 5, 2019, by the Government of India, leading to significant changes in the governance and legal framework of the state.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing Article 370 with other constitutional articles that deal with state autonomy.
  • Misunderstanding the implications of the abrogation of Article 370 on the status of Jammu and Kashmir.
  • Not recognizing the historical and political context surrounding the implementation and subsequent abrogation of Article 370.
Explanation:

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution was a unique provision that granted special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This article was introduced in the Indian Constitution in 1949 and was designed to give the state a degree of autonomy that was not available to other states in India. Under Article 370, the state of Jammu and Kashmir had its own constitution and could make laws on all matters except those that were specifically reserved for the Union government, such as defense, foreign affairs, and communications.

The special status granted by Article 370 was a result of the unique historical and political context of Jammu and Kashmir. When India gained independence in 1947, the princely states were given the option to join either India or Pakistan. Jammu and Kashmir, under the rule of Maharaja Hari Singh, initially chose to remain independent. However, after a Pakistani invasion, the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession, joining India in exchange for military assistance and the promise of a plebiscite to determine the state's future.

The special status under Article 370 was seen as a temporary measure until the plebiscite could be held. However, the plebiscite never took place, and the special status remained in place for decades. Over time, Article 370 became a contentious issue, with debates about its necessity and the implications of its continued existence.

On August 5, 2019, the Government of India, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, decided to abrogate Article 370. This decision was made through a presidential order and a resolution passed by the Indian Parliament. The abrogation of Article 370 led to significant changes in the governance and legal framework of Jammu and Kashmir. The state was reorganized into two union territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. This move was seen as a major shift in the political landscape of the region, with implications for the autonomy and governance of the state.

The abrogation of Article 370 was a highly controversial decision, with supporters arguing that it would lead to greater integration and development of the region, while critics argued that it would undermine the special status and autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir. The decision has had far-reaching implications for the political, social, and economic landscape of the region, and it continues to be a subject of debate and discussion in India and beyond.

In summary, Article 370 was a unique constitutional provision that granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. Its abrogation on August 5, 2019, marked a significant change in the governance and legal framework of the state, leading to its reorganization into two union territories. This decision has had profound implications for the region and remains a topic of considerable interest and debate.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: Incorrect. Article 170 is not related to the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. It pertains to the number of members in the Legislative Assembly of a state, which is a different constitutional provision.
  • Option B: Incorrect. Article 270 is not related to the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. It deals with the distribution of taxes between the Union and the states, which is a different constitutional provision.
  • Option C: Correct. Article 370 granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir, allowing it to have its own constitution and certain laws that were not applicable to other states. This article was abrogated on August 5, 2019, by the Government of India, leading to significant changes in the governance and legal framework of the state.
  • Option D: Incorrect. Article 470 is not related to the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. It pertains to the election of members of the Legislative Assembly of a state, which is a different constitutional provision.
⬅️ Back to Jammu And Kashmir Mcqs: Agriculture, Constitution, Culture, Geography – Practice all questions