📚 Part of: Bhakti Movement & Maharashtra Mcqs: History, Economy, Geography

The place where the Indian National Congress Session was held in December 1920

Category: Maharashtra Gk

Correct Answer: A) Nagpur (Maharashtra).

Exam Relevance: UPSC, SSC, State PSC, Civil Services, Competitive Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Indian National Congress (INC) is a major political party in India and has played a significant role in the country's independence movement. The INC held its annual sessions in various cities across India, and the session in December 1920 was particularly significant as it was held in Nagpur, Maharashtra. This session was crucial for the party's strategy and the Indian independence movement.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing the location of the session with other major cities in Maharashtra.
  • Misremembering the year of the session.
  • Overlooking the significance of the Nagpur session in the context of the Indian independence movement.
Explanation:

The Indian National Congress (INC) is a political party that has played a pivotal role in the Indian independence movement. The party held its annual sessions in various cities across India, and each session was significant for different reasons. The session held in December 1920 was particularly important as it marked a turning point in the Indian independence struggle.

The 1920 session of the Indian National Congress was held in Nagpur, Maharashtra. This choice of location was strategic and symbolic. Nagpur, being centrally located in India, was accessible to a wide range of delegates from different parts of the country. The session was significant for several reasons:

1. **Launch of the Non-Cooperation Movement**: The session in Nagpur was where Mahatma Gandhi launched the Non-Cooperation Movement. This movement aimed to achieve Swaraj (self-rule) through non-violent means, including boycotting British institutions and goods.

2. **Symbolic Significance**: The choice of Nagpur over other major cities like Mumbai or Calcutta (now Kolkata) was symbolic. It represented the party's intention to spread the message of independence and non-cooperation across the country, not just in the major urban centers.

3. **Historical Context**: The 1920s were a crucial period in the Indian independence movement. The Nagpur session came after the failure of the Home Rule Movement and the Rowlatt Act, which had led to widespread discontent among Indians. The session in Nagpur was a response to these events and aimed to galvanize the masses.

4. **Organizational Changes**: The session also saw changes in the organizational structure of the INC. It was decided that the party would be divided into provinces, and each province would have its own committee. This decision was aimed at making the party more grassroots-oriented and responsive to local issues.

The session in Nagpur was not just a political event but also a cultural and social one. It brought together leaders from different parts of India, fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose. The decision to hold the session in Nagpur, rather than in a major city like Mumbai, was a deliberate attempt to reach out to a wider audience and to symbolize the spread of the independence movement across the country.

In conclusion, the Indian National Congress session held in Nagpur in December 1920 was a significant event in the history of the Indian independence movement. It marked the launch of the Non-Cooperation Movement and symbolized the party's commitment to reaching out to the masses across India. The choice of Nagpur as the venue was strategic and reflected the party's broader goals and aspirations.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is correct. The Indian National Congress held its session in Nagpur, Maharashtra, in December 1920. This session was significant as it marked the launch of the Non-Cooperation Movement under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. The choice of Nagpur as the venue was strategic, given its central location in India and its importance in the political landscape of the time.
  • Option B: This option is incorrect. While Mumbai is a significant city in Maharashtra and has hosted many important political events, the Indian National Congress session in December 1920 was not held in Mumbai. The choice of Nagpur over Mumbai was deliberate, reflecting the party's desire to reach out to a wider audience and to symbolize the spread of the independence movement across the country.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect. The session was specifically held in Nagpur, not in Mumbai. The confusion might arise from the fact that both Nagpur and Mumbai are important cities in Maharashtra, but historical records clearly indicate that the 1920 session was held in Nagpur.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect. The session was indeed held in Nagpur, which is in Maharashtra. This option might be chosen by those who are unsure of the exact location but know that the session was held in Maharashtra.

Mnemonic: Nagpur: N for National, A for Assembly, G for Gathering, P for Political, U for Unity, R for Revolution

⬅️ Back to Bhakti Movement & Maharashtra Mcqs: History, Economy, Geography – Practice all questions