📚 Part of: Delhi Climate And Historical Landmarks Mcq Quiz

The Mughal Empire became weak after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, and Nadir Shah, the ruler of Iran, attacked and plundered the city of Delhi in 1739. In fact, later Mughal emperors after Aurangzeb were puppets in the hands of powerful landlords and regional chiefs. What were the origins of these local rulers?

Category: Delhi Gk

Correct Answer: C) Iranis and Turanis.

Exam Relevance: UPSC, SSC, State PSC, Delhi GK

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Mughal Empire's decline after Aurangzeb's death in 1707 led to the rise of local rulers who controlled various regions. These local rulers were often Iranis and Turanis, who had significant influence and power in the fragmented empire.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing the roles of different groups in the Mughal Empire's decline.
  • Overlooking the specific influence of Iranis and Turanis.
  • Misunderstanding the historical context of the Mughal Empire's fragmentation.
Explanation:

The Mughal Empire, which had been a powerful and centralized state under emperors like Akbar, Jahangir, and Shah Jahan, began to decline after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707. Aurangzeb's long and costly wars had weakened the empire's financial and military strength, leading to a power vacuum that was filled by various local rulers and regional chiefs.

The local rulers who emerged during this period were primarily Iranis and Turanis. Iranis were Persian-speaking nobles who had significant influence in the Mughal court and regions. They were often appointed to high-ranking positions and had considerable power. Turanis, on the other hand, were Central Asian Muslims who had migrated to India and had also gained significant influence in the Mughal court and regions.

These local rulers were able to assert their power and control over various regions due to the weakening central authority of the Mughal Empire. They often acted as de facto rulers, with the Mughal emperors becoming mere figureheads. The emperors after Aurangzeb were often puppets in the hands of these powerful landlords and regional chiefs, who controlled the real power.

The rise of these local rulers is a significant aspect of the Mughal Empire's decline. It marked the transition from a centralized empire to a fragmented state with multiple regional powers. This fragmentation made the empire vulnerable to external attacks, such as the plunder of Delhi by Nadir Shah of Iran in 1739.

Understanding the origins and roles of these local rulers is crucial for comprehending the complex political dynamics of the Mughal Empire's decline. The Iranis and Turanis were not just local rulers but also played a significant role in the political and military landscape of the time, contributing to the eventual disintegration of the Mughal Empire.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is incorrect. Americans and Turanis are not historically relevant to the local rulers who gained power after the Mughal Empire's decline. The term "Americans" is anachronistic and does not fit the historical context of the 18th century in India.
  • Option B: This option is incorrect. Europeans and Russians did not play a significant role as local rulers in the Mughal Empire's decline. While Europeans were present in India through trading companies, they were not the local rulers who controlled regions within the empire.
  • Option C: This option is correct. Iranis and Turanis were indeed the local rulers who gained power after the Mughal Empire's decline. Iranis were Persian-speaking nobles, and Turanis were Central Asian Muslims who had significant influence in the Mughal court and regions.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect. Tribals and peasants did not rise to become local rulers in the Mughal Empire's decline. While they were part of the social fabric, they did not have the political and military power to control regions.
⬅️ Back to Delhi Climate And Historical Landmarks Mcq Quiz – Practice all questions