📚 Part of: Indian Administrative Reforms And Medieval History Mcqs

The administration of Delhi Sultanates depends upon able governors and administrators. Consider the following statements:i. Iltutmish appointed his special slaves known as Bandagan in the important political office.ii. Appointment of slaves into important posts became the root cause of the conflict between the old and the new nobility.Choose the correct option from the codes given below:

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: C) Both 1 and 2.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, State PSC Exams, History Competitive Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Delhi Sultanate was a period of Muslim rule in India from the 13th to the 16th century. Iltutmish, a prominent ruler, appointed his trusted slaves, known as Bandagan, to important administrative positions. This practice led to conflicts between the old nobility, who were mostly of Turkish origin, and the new nobility, who were these appointed slaves.

Common Mistakes:
  • Students may confuse the roles of the old and new nobility.
  • Students might not understand the significance of the Bandagan in the administrative structure.
  • Students may overlook the impact of Iltutmish's appointments on the political stability of the Sultanate.
Explanation:

The Delhi Sultanate was a period of Muslim rule in India that lasted from the 13th to the 16th century. During this time, the administration of the Sultanate was heavily dependent on the abilities of its governors and administrators. One of the most significant rulers of the Delhi Sultanate was Iltutmish, who ruled from 1211 to 1236 CE. Iltutmish's administration was characterized by a unique approach to governance, which included the appointment of his trusted slaves, known as Bandagan, to important political offices.

The Bandagan were a group of slaves who were personally loyal to Iltutmish and were often appointed to high-ranking positions within the administration. This practice was significant because it allowed Iltutmish to place individuals he trusted in key roles, thereby ensuring loyalty and control over the administration. The Bandagan were often chosen based on their abilities and loyalty rather than their social or ethnic background, which was a departure from the traditional practice of appointing nobles based on their lineage.

However, this practice of appointing Bandagan to important positions also led to significant conflicts within the administration. The old nobility, who were mostly of Turkish origin and had traditionally held high-ranking positions, felt threatened by the rise of the new nobility, which consisted of the Bandagan. The old nobility saw the Bandagan as upstarts who had risen to power through the favor of Iltutmish, rather than through their own lineage or traditional status. This led to a conflict between the old and new nobility, which had a significant impact on the political stability of the Sultanate.

The conflict between the old and new nobility was not just a matter of personal rivalry but also had broader implications for the administration of the Sultanate. The old nobility, who were accustomed to their traditional roles and privileges, were often resistant to the changes brought about by the appointment of the Bandagan. This resistance could lead to political instability and could undermine the effectiveness of the administration. On the other hand, the Bandagan, who were often more loyal to Iltutmish and his policies, could bring a fresh perspective to the administration and help to modernize and streamline the governance of the Sultanate.

In conclusion, both statements are correct and significant in understanding the administrative practices and conflicts during the Delhi Sultanate. Iltutmish's appointment of the Bandagan to important political offices was a key aspect of his governance, and the resulting conflict between the old and new nobility had a significant impact on the political dynamics of the Sultanate. This practice of appointing loyal slaves to high-ranking positions was a unique feature of Iltutmish's administration and had lasting effects on the governance of the Delhi Sultanate.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is incorrect because it only acknowledges the first statement about Iltutmish appointing his Bandagan to important political offices. The second statement about the conflict between the old and new nobility is also true and significant in understanding the administrative dynamics of the Delhi Sultanate.
  • Option B: This option is incorrect because it only acknowledges the second statement about the conflict between the old and new nobility. The first statement about Iltutmish's appointment of Bandagan to important political offices is also true and relevant to the administrative structure of the Delhi Sultanate.
  • Option C: This option is correct because both statements are true and significant. Iltutmish did appoint his Bandagan to important political offices, and this practice did lead to conflicts between the old and new nobility, which had a significant impact on the administration of the Delhi Sultanate.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect because it suggests that neither statement is true, which is not the case. Both statements are accurate and important in understanding the administrative practices and conflicts during the Delhi Sultanate.
⬅️ Back to Indian Administrative Reforms And Medieval History Mcqs – Practice all questions