Salma lives in Delhi. She needs a job. She gives her interview. She is rejected by Mr. Shah even when she qualified for the job. (He prefers gujarati and vegetarian staff only.)

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Hint: Consider the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India.

Correct Answer: B) She must use her right to equality.

Exam Relevance: UPSC, SSC, Banking Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Explanations:

The right to equality is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution of India under Article 14. This right ensures that all citizens are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law. It prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. In the context of employment, this means that employers cannot discriminate against candidates based on their ethnicity, dietary preferences, or other personal characteristics that are not relevant to job performance.

In the given scenario, Salma is a qualified candidate for a job in Delhi. However, she is rejected by Mr. Shah because he prefers to hire Gujarati and vegetarian staff. This is a clear case of discrimination based on ethnicity and dietary preferences, which are not relevant to job qualifications. Such discrimination is illegal under the right to equality.

Salma can use her right to equality to challenge Mr. Shah's discriminatory hiring practices. This right is designed to protect individuals from unfair treatment in various aspects of life, including employment. By asserting her right to equality, Salma can seek legal recourse to address the discrimination she has faced.

It is important to understand that the right to equality is not just a moral or ethical principle but a legal right that is enforceable in a court of law. Employers are legally obligated to provide equal opportunities to all candidates and cannot make hiring decisions based on irrelevant personal characteristics. This ensures a fair and just employment environment where qualifications and merit are the primary criteria for selection.

While the term "right to exploitation" is not a recognized legal term, the right to equality is a well-established principle in Indian law. Therefore, the correct answer is that Salma must use her right to equality to address the discrimination she has faced.

Option Analysis:

Option A: This option is incorrect. The term "right to exploitation" is not a recognized legal term in the context of the Indian Constitution. The correct term would be the right to equality, which protects against discrimination in employment.
Option B: This option is correct. The right to equality under the Indian Constitution prohibits discrimination in employment based on factors such as ethnicity and dietary preferences. Salma can use this right to challenge the discriminatory hiring practices of Mr. Shah.
Option C: This option is incorrect. Since the right to exploitation is not a valid legal term, and the right to equality is the correct principle to apply in this situation, this option cannot be correct.
Option D: This option is incorrect. The right to equality is a valid and applicable principle in this scenario, so it cannot be true that neither option is correct.

Back to Miscellaneous Indian Gk set 249 – Practice all questions