📚 Part of: Ancient Indian Inscriptions And Epigraphy Mcqs

Pick two states that were annexed under the Subsidiary Alliance

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: B) Garkwads and Hyderabad.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, State PSC Exams, History Olympiads

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a policy introduced by the British East India Company in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Under this policy, Indian states were required to maintain a British military force within their territories and pay for its upkeep. In return, the British promised to protect the state from external threats. This effectively made the states dependent on British military support and eventually led to their annexation.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing the Subsidiary Alliance with other British policies like the Doctrine of Lapse.
  • Misunderstanding the long-term implications of the Subsidiary Alliance, which often led to the eventual annexation of the states.
  • Not recognizing the specific states that were annexed under the Subsidiary Alliance.
Explanation:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a significant policy introduced by the British East India Company in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. This policy was a strategic move to consolidate British control over Indian states by making them dependent on British military support. Under the Subsidiary Alliance, Indian rulers were required to maintain a British military force within their territories and pay for its upkeep. In return, the British promised to protect the state from external threats. However, this arrangement often led to the eventual annexation of the states, as the British could use the military force to exert control over the state's internal affairs and ultimately take over the administration.

The Gwalior state, ruled by the Garkwads, was annexed in 1844 under the Subsidiary Alliance. The British used the pretext of the state's inability to pay for the maintenance of the British military force to annex Gwalior. Similarly, Hyderabad, one of the largest princely states in India, was brought under British control through the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798. The Nizam of Hyderabad agreed to the terms of the Subsidiary Alliance, which eventually led to British control over the state's foreign policy and military affairs.

It is important to note that the Subsidiary Alliance was not the only policy used by the British to annex Indian states. Other policies, such as the Doctrine of Lapse and direct annexation, were also employed. However, the Subsidiary Alliance was a key policy that allowed the British to exert control over many Indian states and eventually annex them.

Understanding the Subsidiary Alliance and its impact on Indian states is crucial for comprehending the broader context of British colonialism in India. It highlights the strategic and often manipulative methods used by the British to expand their control over the subcontinent. The policy of the Subsidiary Alliance was a significant factor in the eventual consolidation of British power in India, leading to the establishment of the British Raj.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is incorrect. Udaipur and Jodhpur were not annexed under the Subsidiary Alliance. These states were part of the Rajputana region and were generally allowed to maintain their sovereignty under British protection, but not through the Subsidiary Alliance. The misconception here might arise from the belief that all Indian states were annexed under the same policy, which is not true.
  • Option B: This option is correct. The Garkwads (Gwalior) and Hyderabad were indeed annexed under the Subsidiary Alliance. The Gwalior state was annexed in 1844, and Hyderabad was brought under British control through the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798. The Subsidiary Alliance was a key policy that allowed the British to exert control over these states and eventually annex them.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect. Since Option A is incorrect, this option cannot be correct. The misconception here might arise from a lack of specific knowledge about which states were annexed under the Subsidiary Alliance and which were not.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect. Since Option B is correct, this option cannot be correct. The misconception here might arise from a misunderstanding of the specific states that were annexed under the Subsidiary Alliance.

Mnemonic: Subsidiary Alliance: "S" for "Subservience" - states became subservient to British control.

⬅️ Back to Ancient Indian Inscriptions And Epigraphy Mcqs – Practice all questions