Explanation: The Delhi Sultanate was a significant period in Indian history, spanning from the early 13th to the mid-16th century. It was a Muslim kingdom based in Delhi that ruled large parts of the Indian subcontinent. The question asks us to identify historical figures who were not associated with the Delhi Sultanate's loyalty.
Minhaj-i-Siraj, a prominent historian and scholar, wrote the "Tabaqat-i-Nasiri," a historical work that covers the history of the Delhi Sultanate. However, Minhaj-i-Siraj was not a ruler and did not have any direct loyalty to the Delhi Sultanate. He was more of an observer and chronicler of the events that took place during the period of the Delhi Sultanate.
Mohammed Ghori, on the other hand, was a ruler of the Ghurid Empire and is known for his invasions of India. His military campaigns laid the foundation for the Delhi Sultanate, but he himself was not a part of the Delhi Sultanate. He was a foreign invader who established the initial foothold for the Delhi Sultanate, but he was not loyal to it as he was not a part of its governance.
Mohammed Alam Shah, however, was the last ruler of the Delhi Sultanate, ruling from 1445 to 1451. He was directly associated with the Delhi Sultanate and was loyal to it. Therefore, he does not fit the criteria of the question.
The correct answer, therefore, is option D, which correctly identifies that only Minhaj-i-Siraj and Mohammed Ghori were not from the Delhi Sultanate loyalty. This answer is based on the historical roles and associations of these figures with the Delhi Sultanate.
Understanding the roles and loyalties of historical figures is crucial in Indian history, especially when studying the Delhi Sultanate period. It helps in distinguishing between rulers, historians, and other significant figures who played different roles in shaping the history of the region.