Explanations:In a democratic society, the administration of justice is a fundamental pillar that ensures the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. The judiciary must be independent and impartial to maintain public trust and uphold the principles of justice. One of the key principles that underpin judicial independence is the administration of justice without fear and favour.
The phrase "without fear and favour" is a well-known expression in legal and political contexts. It means that judges must not be influenced by external pressures or personal biases. "Fear" refers to the influence of threats or intimidation, while "favour" refers to the influence of personal relationships or biases. Both of these elements can undermine the impartiality and independence of the judiciary.
For example, if a judge is influenced by fear, they might make decisions based on threats or intimidation rather than the law and the facts of the case. Similarly, if a judge is influenced by favour, they might make decisions based on personal relationships or biases rather than the law and the facts of the case. In both cases, the integrity of the judicial process is compromised, and the administration of justice is no longer fair and impartial.
It is important to note that while other values such as kindness, morality, appreciation, and love are important in many contexts, they are not the specific principles that ensure the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The phrase "without fear and favour" is a standard expression used to emphasize the need for judicial independence and impartiality in a democratic society.
Therefore, the correct answer is that justice, which is the soul of a democratic society, must be administered without fear and favour. This ensures that the judiciary remains independent and impartial, upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens.