Part of: Rajasthan Gk set 33

In Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, villagers have fought against mining by citing which act?

Category: Rajasthan Gk

Hint: Consider the primary purpose of the act that would most directly protect wildlife habitats.

Correct Answer: B) Wildlife Protection Act.

Exam Relevance: UPSC, SSC, State PSC

Difficulty: Moderate

Explanations:

The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 is a significant piece of legislation in India that aims to protect and conserve wildlife. This act is crucial for the preservation of wildlife habitats and the regulation of activities that could harm wildlife. It establishes a legal framework that includes the creation of protected areas such as national parks and wildlife sanctuaries, and it regulates hunting, trade, and other activities that could impact wildlife.

In the context of Sariska Tiger Reserve, the Wildlife Protection Act is particularly relevant. Sariska is a tiger reserve located in Rajasthan, India, and it is home to a variety of wildlife, including the Bengal tiger. The act provides the legal basis for the protection of the tiger and other wildlife species within the reserve. It also regulates activities that could harm the wildlife, such as mining, which can lead to habitat destruction and other negative impacts on the ecosystem.

The villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve have fought against mining activities by citing the Wildlife Protection Act. This act gives them a legal basis to argue that mining activities could harm the wildlife and their habitat, which is protected under the act. The act provides for the establishment of a buffer zone around the reserve, where mining activities are restricted to protect the wildlife and their habitat.

It is important to understand the specific provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act that relate to the protection of wildlife habitats and the regulation of activities that could harm wildlife. The act not only protects the wildlife but also ensures that the habitats are preserved, which is crucial for the survival of the species. The act also provides for the establishment of a legal framework that includes penalties for violations, which helps to deter activities that could harm wildlife.

Other acts such as the Indian Forests Act, the Mining and Mineral Development Regulation Act, and the Fisheries Act are related to different aspects of environmental protection but do not specifically address the protection of wildlife in the same way as the Wildlife Protection Act. Therefore, the Wildlife Protection Act is the most relevant legal framework that villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve would cite to fight against mining activities.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: The Indian Forests Act is primarily concerned with the management and conservation of forest resources, not specifically wildlife protection. It does not provide the specific legal framework that villagers would cite to fight against mining in a wildlife reserve.
  • Option B: The Wildlife Protection Act is the correct answer. This act provides the legal framework for the protection of wildlife and their habitats. Villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve would cite this act to fight against mining activities that could harm the wildlife and their habitat.
  • Option C: The Mining and Mineral Development Regulation Act is related to the regulation of mining activities but does not specifically address wildlife protection. It would not be the primary legal basis for villagers to fight against mining in a wildlife reserve.
  • Option D: The Fisheries Act is related to the regulation of fisheries and aquatic resources, which is not directly relevant to the protection of wildlife in a tiger reserve. It would not be the act that villagers would cite to fight against mining activities.

Mnemonic: WPA for Wildlife Protection Act

Back to Rajasthan Gk set 33 – Practice all questions