📚 Part of: Rajasthan Geography And History Mcqs

In Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, villagers have fought against mining by citing which act?

Category: Rajasthan Gk

Correct Answer: B) Wildlife Protection Act.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, State PSC Exams, Environmental Science Exams, Geography Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 is a comprehensive legislation in India aimed at protecting and conserving wildlife. It provides for the protection of wild animals, birds, and plants, and regulates hunting and trade in wildlife. The act also empowers the government to declare certain areas as wildlife sanctuaries and national parks, and to regulate activities within these areas.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing the Wildlife Protection Act with other environmental laws such as the Indian Forests Act or the Mining And Mineral Development Regulation Act.
  • Overlooking the specific context of the Sariska Tiger Reserve and the role of the Wildlife Protection Act in protecting wildlife habitats.
Explanation:

The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 is a critical piece of legislation in India that aims to protect and conserve wildlife. It is designed to safeguard wild animals, birds, and plants, and it regulates hunting and trade in wildlife. The act also empowers the government to declare certain areas as wildlife sanctuaries and national parks, and to regulate activities within these areas to ensure the protection of wildlife and their habitats.

In the context of the Sariska Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan, the Wildlife Protection Act plays a crucial role. Sariska is a protected area under the Wildlife Protection Act, designated as a tiger reserve to conserve the tiger population and their habitat. The act provides legal grounds for the protection of wildlife and their habitats, and it is the primary legislation that villagers would cite to oppose mining activities that could harm the tiger population and their environment.

Mining activities can have significant negative impacts on wildlife habitats, including habitat destruction, pollution, and disruption of the ecological balance. The Wildlife Protection Act recognizes these threats and provides mechanisms to prevent or mitigate such impacts. By citing the Wildlife Protection Act, villagers in Sariska can legally challenge mining activities that threaten the conservation of wildlife and their habitats.

The Indian Forests Act, while important for the management and conservation of forest resources, is not the primary legislation that villagers would cite to oppose mining activities in the context of wildlife protection. Similarly, the Mining And Mineral Development Regulation Act and the Fisheries Act, while relevant to their respective domains, do not directly address the protection of wildlife in terrestrial habitats like the Sariska Tiger Reserve.

In conclusion, the Wildlife Protection Act is the most appropriate and relevant legislation that villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve would cite to oppose mining activities that could harm the tiger population and their habitat. This act provides the legal framework necessary to protect wildlife and their habitats, making it the correct answer in this context.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: The Indian Forests Act is primarily concerned with the management and conservation of forest resources. While it does play a role in protecting wildlife within forest areas, it is not the primary legislation that villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve would cite to oppose mining activities. The Wildlife Protection Act is more directly relevant to the protection of wildlife and their habitats.
  • Option B: The Wildlife Protection Act is the correct answer. This act is specifically designed to protect wildlife and their habitats. Villagers in Sariska Tiger Reserve would cite this act to oppose mining activities that could harm the tiger population and their habitat. The act provides legal grounds to challenge activities that threaten wildlife conservation.
  • Option C: The Mining And Mineral Development Regulation Act is related to the regulation of mining activities but does not specifically address wildlife conservation. While it may have provisions that indirectly protect wildlife, it is not the primary legislation that villagers would cite to oppose mining in the context of wildlife protection.
  • Option D: The Fisheries Act is primarily concerned with the regulation of fisheries and aquatic resources. It does not directly address the protection of wildlife in terrestrial habitats such as the Sariska Tiger Reserve. Therefore, it is not the act that villagers would cite to oppose mining activities in the reserve.

Mnemonic: WPA for Wildlife Protection Act

⬅️ Back to Rajasthan Geography And History Mcqs – Practice all questions