📚 Part of: Indian History And Geography Mcqs: Colonial Rule, Constitutional Amendments, And Natural Disasters

In our state, according to NFHS 4, how many children under 5 year of age are Stunted?

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: A) 35.4%.

Exam Relevance: UPSC, SSC, State PSC, Bank PO, MBA Entrance

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

NFHS (National Family Health Survey) is a large-scale, multi-round survey conducted in India to assess the health and nutritional status of the population. Stunting is a condition where children are too short for their age, indicating chronic malnutrition. NFHS 4, conducted in 2015-16, reported that 35.4% of children under 5 years of age in India were stunted.

Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing stunting with wasting or underweight.
  • Misinterpreting the data from different NFHS rounds.
  • Not understanding the specific percentage reported for stunting.
Explanation:

NFHS (National Family Health Survey) is a comprehensive survey conducted in India to assess the health and nutritional status of the population. The NFHS is conducted in multiple rounds, with NFHS 4 being the most recent, carried out between 2015 and 2016. One of the key indicators measured in NFHS 4 is the prevalence of stunting among children under 5 years of age.

Stunting is a condition where children are too short for their age, indicating chronic malnutrition. It is a significant public health issue as it reflects long-term nutritional deficiencies and can have lasting impacts on a child's physical and cognitive development. Stunting is typically measured using the height-for-age z-score, which compares a child's height to the median height of a reference population of the same age and sex.

According to NFHS 4, 35.4% of children under 5 years of age in India were stunted. This high prevalence of stunting highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing malnutrition and improving the nutritional status of children in India. The data from NFHS 4 is crucial for policymakers, health professionals, and researchers to understand the extent of the problem and to design and implement effective interventions to reduce stunting rates.

It is important to note that stunting is different from other nutritional indicators such as wasting (low weight-for-height) and underweight (low weight-for-age). While stunting reflects chronic malnutrition, wasting indicates acute malnutrition, and underweight can be a combination of both chronic and acute malnutrition. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for interpreting the data correctly and designing appropriate interventions.

The high prevalence of stunting reported in NFHS 4 underscores the need for comprehensive strategies to address malnutrition, including improving access to nutritious food, promoting breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices, and addressing underlying factors such as poverty, sanitation, and healthcare access. By understanding the specific data and indicators from NFHS 4, stakeholders can work towards reducing the prevalence of stunting and improving the overall nutritional status of children in India.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is correct. According to NFHS 4, 35.4% of children under 5 years of age in India were stunted. Stunting is a significant indicator of chronic malnutrition and reflects long-term nutritional deficiencies.
  • Option B: This option is incorrect. The percentage of children under 5 years of age who were stunted, as per NFHS 4, is 35.4%, not 25.50%. This lower percentage might be a common misconception due to a misunderstanding of the data or confusion with other nutritional indicators.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect. The correct percentage of stunted children under 5 years of age, as per NFHS 4, is 35.4%, not 28.90%. This option might be chosen due to a misinterpretation of the data or confusion with other nutritional status indicators.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect. The correct percentage of stunted children under 5 years of age, as per NFHS 4, is 35.4%, not 27.10%. This option might be chosen due to a misunderstanding of the specific NFHS 4 data or confusion with other nutritional status indicators.
⬅️ Back to Indian History And Geography Mcqs: Colonial Rule, Constitutional Amendments, And Natural Disasters – Practice all questions