Part of: Miscellaneous Indian Gk set 358

In emergency period The president of india under Art.359 he can suspect all Fundamental Rights. Except Art 20&21. Say it's true

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Hint: Consider the specific rights that are protected even during a state of emergency.

Correct Answer: A) Yes

Exam Relevance: UPSC, Civil Services, State PSC, CLAT, Law Entrance Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Explanations:

The Indian Constitution provides for the suspension of certain Fundamental Rights during a state of emergency. This is governed by Article 359, which allows the President to suspend the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, except for Articles 20 and 21. Article 20 guarantees protection in respect of conviction for offenses, while Article 21 ensures the protection of life and personal liberty. These two articles are considered so fundamental to the rights of individuals that they cannot be suspended even during an emergency.

Article 359(1) states that the President may, by order, suspend the enforcement of the rights conferred by Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution during the period of a proclaimed emergency. However, Article 359(2) specifically excludes Articles 20 and 21 from this suspension. This exclusion is crucial because it ensures that even in times of emergency, the basic rights to life and personal liberty, as well as protection against arbitrary conviction, remain intact.

The rationale behind this exclusion is to prevent the state from infringing upon the most basic and essential rights of individuals, even in times of crisis. The Constitution recognizes that these rights are so fundamental that they should not be compromised, even if the government is taking extraordinary measures to address a national emergency.

It is important to understand the context and implications of Article 359. The President's power to suspend Fundamental Rights is a significant one, but it is also subject to certain limitations and checks. The suspension of rights must be done in a manner that is reasonable and justifiable, and it must be for the duration of the emergency only. The exclusion of Articles 20 and 21 from suspension ensures that the state cannot use the emergency as a pretext to violate the most basic human rights.

In summary, the correct answer is "Yes" because the President can suspend most Fundamental Rights during an emergency, but Articles 20 and 21 are specifically protected and cannot be suspended. This understanding is crucial for anyone studying the Indian Constitution and the balance between state power and individual rights during emergencies.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is correct. During a state of emergency, the President can suspend most Fundamental Rights under Article 359, but Articles 20 and 21 are specifically protected and cannot be suspended.
  • Option B: This option is incorrect. It suggests that the President cannot suspend Fundamental Rights during an emergency, which is not true. However, it fails to recognize the specific protections afforded to Articles 20 and 21.

Mnemonic: Remember: "20-21, Always Safe"

Back to Miscellaneous Indian Gk set 358 – Practice all questions