Part of: Miscellaneous Indian Gk set 58

In case of a clash between the laws made by the centre and a state on a subject in the concurrent list:

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Hint: Consider the constitutional provisions regarding the concurrent list.

Correct Answer: B) The central law prevails.

Exam Relevance: UPSC, SSC, State PSC

Difficulty: Moderate

Explanations:

In the Indian federal system, the Constitution divides legislative powers between the central government and the state governments. This division is outlined in three lists: the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List. The Concurrent List contains subjects on which both the central and state governments can make laws. However, in the event of a conflict between a central law and a state law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails.

The principle of central law precedence in the Concurrent List is rooted in the Constitution's provisions. Article 254 of the Indian Constitution addresses this issue. It states that if a law made by the state is inconsistent with a law made by Parliament, and both laws are made in the Concurrent List, the central law will prevail. This is a fundamental aspect of the relationship between the central and state governments in India.

The Concurrent List includes subjects such as marriage and divorce, adoption, succession, property, bankruptcy and insolvency, trusts and trustees, and others. While both the central and state governments can make laws on these subjects, the central government's laws take precedence in case of a conflict. This ensures a uniform application of laws across the country, which is crucial for maintaining national unity and consistency in governance.

It is important to note that the Supreme Court does not have to intervene in every case of conflict between central and state laws on a subject in the Concurrent List. The Constitution provides a clear precedence for central laws, and this is a well-established principle in Indian federalism. The Supreme Court may intervene in specific cases to interpret the Constitution or to resolve disputes, but the general rule is that central laws prevail in the Concurrent List.

Understanding this principle is crucial for students preparing for competitive exams such as the UPSC, SSC, and State PSC, as questions related to the Concurrent List and the precedence of central laws often appear in these exams. It is essential to grasp the constitutional provisions and the implications of these provisions on the functioning of the Indian federal system.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is incorrect because the Indian Constitution stipulates that in the event of a conflict between central and state laws on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. State laws do not have precedence over central laws in such cases.
  • Option B: This option is correct. According to the Indian Constitution, in the event of a conflict between central and state laws on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. This is a fundamental principle of Indian federalism.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect because it suggests that both laws can coexist without any conflict, which is not the case. The Constitution clearly states that in the event of a conflict, the central law prevails over the state law.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect because the Supreme Court does not have to intervene to decide in every case of conflict between central and state laws on a subject in the Concurrent List. The Constitution provides a clear precedence for central laws in such conflicts.

Mnemonic: C-Law: Central Law Wins

Back to Miscellaneous Indian Gk set 58 – Practice all questions