📚 Part of: Mumbai Landmarks And British Colonial Architecture Mcqs

In case of a clash between the laws made by the centre and a state on a subject in the concurrent list:

Category: Miscellaneous Indian Gk

Correct Answer: B) The central law prevails.

Exam Relevance: UPSC Civil Services, State PSC Exams, Law Entrance Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

In India, the Concurrent List in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution allows both the Central and State governments to make laws on certain subjects. However, in case of a conflict between a central law and a state law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. This is governed by Article 254 of the Indian Constitution.

Common Mistakes:
  • Students often confuse the Concurrent List with the State List, where state laws have supremacy.
  • Some students may think that the Supreme Court always intervenes in such conflicts, which is not the case as the Constitution clearly states the precedence of central laws.
  • There is a misconception that both laws can coexist and apply within their respective jurisdictions, which is incorrect as per the Constitution.
Explanation:

In the Indian federal system, the Constitution of India divides legislative powers between the Central Government and the State Governments through the Seventh Schedule, which contains three lists: the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List. The Concurrent List includes subjects on which both the Central and State governments can make laws. Examples of subjects in the Concurrent List include criminal law, marriage and divorce, bankruptcy and insolvency, and economic and social planning.

When both the Central and State governments make laws on a subject in the Concurrent List, a situation may arise where these laws conflict with each other. To resolve such conflicts, Article 254 of the Indian Constitution provides a clear rule. According to Article 254(1), if a law made by the State is inconsistent with a law made by Parliament which Parliament is competent to make, then the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the State, shall prevail and the law made by the State, to the extent of the inconsistency, shall be void.

This means that in case of a conflict, the central law will override the state law. The state law will be considered void to the extent of the inconsistency. This provision ensures that there is uniformity in laws across the country on subjects in the Concurrent List, as the central law will have precedence.

It is important to note that this rule does not apply to laws made by the State on subjects in the State List, where the state law prevails. Additionally, the Supreme Court does not need to intervene to decide the precedence of laws in the Concurrent List, as the Constitution itself provides the rule that the central law prevails in case of a conflict.

Understanding the provisions of the Concurrent List and the rules governing conflicts between central and state laws is crucial for comprehending the balance of power between the Central and State governments in India. This knowledge is essential for students preparing for competitive examinations such as the UPSC Civil Services and State PSC Exams, as well as for those studying constitutional law.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is incorrect. According to Article 254 of the Indian Constitution, if a state law conflicts with a central law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. The state law is deemed to be void to the extent of the conflict.
  • Option B: This option is correct. Article 254 of the Indian Constitution clearly states that in case of a conflict between a central law and a state law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. This ensures uniformity in laws across the country on certain subjects.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect. Both laws cannot prevail within their respective jurisdictions. The Constitution mandates that the central law prevails in case of a conflict, and the state law is void to the extent of the conflict.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect. The Supreme Court does not have to intervene to decide the precedence of laws in the Concurrent List. The Constitution itself provides the rule that the central law prevails in case of a conflict.

Mnemonic: C-LAW: Central Law Always Wins

⬅️ Back to Mumbai Landmarks And British Colonial Architecture Mcqs – Practice all questions