📚 Part of: West Bengal History And Biodiversity Mcqs

In 1770 famine in Bengal, about ..... was wiped out.

Category: West Bengal Gk

Correct Answer: A) One-third of the population.

Exam Relevance: West Bengal Civil Services, UPSC, IAS, History Exams

Difficulty: Moderate

Concept notes:

The Bengal famine of 1770 was a severe famine that occurred in the lower Gangetic plain of India, primarily in the modern-day state of West Bengal. It is estimated that about one-third of the population perished due to this famine, which was exacerbated by the policies of the East India Company.

Common Mistakes:
  • Students may confuse the impact of the famine with other historical events or famines.
  • They might underestimate the scale of the disaster, thinking it affected a smaller portion of the population.
  • Some might overestimate the impact, believing the entire population was affected.
Explanation:

The Bengal famine of 1770 was a catastrophic event that occurred in the lower Gangetic plain of India, primarily affecting the region that is now the state of West Bengal. This famine is considered one of the most severe in Indian history, with estimates suggesting that about one-third of the population perished. The famine was a result of a combination of natural and human factors.

Natural factors included a severe drought that led to crop failures. The region heavily depended on agriculture, and the failure of crops due to lack of rainfall had a devastating impact on the food supply. The human factors were largely related to the policies of the East India Company, which had taken control of the region. The company's primary focus was on revenue collection, and they imposed heavy taxes on the local population. This led to a situation where the people had to sell their food reserves to pay taxes, leaving them vulnerable to starvation when the crops failed.

The East India Company's policies also included the promotion of cash crops like indigo and opium over food crops. This shift in agricultural focus further exacerbated the food shortage. Additionally, the company's administrative practices, such as the system of revenue farming, where local landlords were responsible for collecting taxes, often led to exploitation and further hardship for the peasants.

The impact of the famine was not just limited to the immediate loss of life but also had long-term effects on the region's economy and social structure. The population decline led to a labor shortage, which affected agricultural productivity and economic recovery. The famine also highlighted the vulnerability of the agrarian economy to natural disasters and the need for better governance and disaster management.

In conclusion, the Bengal famine of 1770 was a significant historical event that had a profound impact on the region. The estimated loss of one-third of the population underscores the severity of the disaster and the need for a comprehensive understanding of the factors that contributed to it. This event serves as a critical case study in the study of colonial history, economic policies, and the impact of natural disasters on human populations.

Option Analysis:
  • Option A: This option is correct. Historical records and estimates suggest that about one-third of the population in Bengal perished during the famine of 1770. The famine was exacerbated by a combination of natural factors, such as crop failure due to drought, and human factors, including the policies of the East India Company, which prioritized revenue collection over the welfare of the population.
  • Option B: This option is incorrect. While the famine was devastating, it did not wipe out half of the population. The impact was significant, but not as severe as this option suggests. The exact figure of one-third is based on historical estimates and records.
  • Option C: This option is incorrect. The famine was catastrophic, but it did not result in the complete annihilation of the population. Such an event would have been unprecedented and is not supported by historical evidence. The population did suffer greatly, but a significant portion survived.
  • Option D: This option is incorrect. While the loss of one-fourth of the population would still be a significant tragedy, historical estimates and records indicate that the impact was more severe, with about one-third of the population perishing. This option underestimates the scale of the disaster.
⬅️ Back to West Bengal History And Biodiversity Mcqs – Practice all questions