Explanations:The partition of Bengal in 1905 was a significant event in the history of British India. The partition was intended to divide the province into two parts: West Bengal, which was predominantly Hindu, and East Bengal, which was predominantly Muslim. This division was seen by the British as a way to reduce the influence of the Indian National Congress, which was largely Hindu-dominated, and to create a separate Muslim-majority region that could be more easily controlled.
The partition was met with mixed reactions. While the Hindu community largely opposed the partition, seeing it as a divide-and-rule tactic by the British, the Muslim community was more divided. Some Muslims welcomed the partition as a step towards greater political representation and autonomy for the Muslim community. However, the partition also led to significant communal tensions and violence between Hindus and Muslims.
In 1911, the British government decided to reverse the partition of Bengal. This decision was made in response to the widespread opposition to the partition, particularly from the Hindu community, and the growing nationalist movement in India. The reversal of the partition was seen as a political move by the British to appease the Hindu community and to weaken the Muslim community's influence.
The Muslim community, which had initially seen the partition as a potential step towards greater political representation, felt betrayed by the reversal. They viewed the decision as a political maneuver that undermined their interests and aspirations for a separate Muslim-majority region. The reversal of the partition was seen as a betrayal of the promises made to the Muslim community and as a move to strengthen the Hindu-dominated nationalist movement.
Therefore, the correct answer is that the Muslims felt betrayed by the reversal of the Bengal partition. This reaction reflects the complex political and communal dynamics of the time and the deep-seated tensions between different communities in British India.