Explanations:The question asks whether any land has seceded from India since the time of the Harappan civilization. To understand this, we need to delve into the historical context of the Indian subcontinent and the significant territorial changes that have occurred over time.
The Harappan civilization, also known as the Indus Valley civilization, flourished around 2600 BCE to 1900 BCE. This ancient civilization was one of the earliest urban cultures in the world and covered a vast area in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent, including parts of present-day Pakistan and northwest India.
Since the time of the Harappan civilization, the Indian subcontinent has undergone several significant territorial changes. The most notable of these changes occurred in the 20th century with the partition of India in 1947. The partition led to the creation of two separate nations: India and Pakistan. This event was a result of the Indian independence movement and the British colonial administration's decision to divide the subcontinent based on religious demographics.
Following the partition, Pakistan was formed as a separate nation, comprising the western and eastern parts of the former British India. The western part became modern-day Pakistan, while the eastern part, which was geographically separated from the western part by India, became East Pakistan. In 1971, East Pakistan seceded from Pakistan and became the independent nation of Bangladesh. This secession was the result of a war of independence and marked another significant territorial change in the region.
Therefore, the correct answer is that land has indeed seceded from India since the time of the Harappan civilization. Specifically, Pakistan and Bangladesh are the two territories that have seceded. Pakistan was formed in 1947, and Bangladesh seceded from Pakistan in 1971. These events represent significant historical and political changes in the Indian subcontinent.
It is important to note that the other options provided in the question are either nonsensical or incorrect. Options C and D include fictional or nonsensical terms like Pac-Man and Bingleedish, which do not represent any historical territorial changes. Option B incorrectly includes Sri Lanka, which was never part of India and thus cannot be considered a secession.
In summary, the question tests the understanding of historical territorial changes in the Indian subcontinent, particularly the partition of India and the subsequent secession of Bangladesh. These events are crucial in understanding the modern political geography of the region.