Explanations:The partition of Bengal in 1905 by Lord Curzon, the Viceroy of India, was a significant event that sparked widespread protests among the Hindu population. The partition was seen as an attempt to divide and rule, and it led to a strong nationalist movement in Bengal and across India. The British response to these protests was marked by a series of repressive measures and policies aimed at curbing the nationalist sentiment.
The period from 1906 to 1908 was particularly significant in the context of the British reaction to Hindu protests in Bengal. In 1906, the British government introduced the Indian Councils Act, which was intended to increase the number of elected members in the legislative councils. However, this act was seen as insufficient by the nationalist movement, and protests continued.
In 1907, the British government introduced the Morley-Minto Reforms, which further increased the number of elected members in the legislative councils. However, these reforms were also seen as inadequate by the nationalist movement, and the protests continued. The British government responded with increased repression, including the arrest and prosecution of nationalist leaders and the introduction of the Rowlatt Act in 1919, which aimed to curb the nationalist movement.
The period from 1906 to 1908 was marked by a series of events that demonstrated the British government's determination to suppress the nationalist movement in Bengal. The introduction of the Rowlatt Act in 1919 was a significant event that further intensified the nationalist movement and led to the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre in 1919, which became a turning point in the Indian independence movement.
Therefore, the correct answer is D) 1906 to 1908, as this period marks the British reaction to Hindu protests in Bengal, including the introduction of repressive measures and the suppression of the nationalist movement.